A topnotch WordPress.com site

Monthly Archives: April 2020

Proof of Abrogation From the Bible Part 3

Source: https://thedebateinitiative.com/2014/12/03/abrogation-in-the-bible/

Christian apologists often try to cast doubt on Islam because of the issue of abrogation.

In this article we will turn the tables on Christian apologists, by bringing up abrogation taking part in the Bible. Bear in mind, Christian apologists try to argue against the Quran because of abrogation, therefore if they are consistent and follow their own criteria, the should now argue and doubt the Bible because it too contains abrogation.

Can you marry your sister?

In the Bible, we read that Abraham married his half sister:

Genesis 20:11-12: And Abraham said, Because I thought, Surely the fear of God is not in this place; and they will slay me for my wife’s sake. And yet indeed she is my sister; she is the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife.

Later on in the Bible we read that such a marriage is forbidden, and the one who practices it is cursed:

Deuteronomy 27:22: Cursedbe he that lies with his sister, the daughter of his father, or the daughter of his mother. And all the people shall say, Amen

So this is a clear example of a change in ruling, previously there was no command against marrying your sister, as Abraham (pbuh) practiced such an act. Afterwards however, in the law of Moses (pbuh), marrying your sister was forbidden, and the person who would do such a marriage would be cursed. Read more of this post

Proof of Abrogation From the Bible Part 2

Abrogation in Bible in detail …

Source: https://www.facebook.com/notes/answering-christanity/abrogation-in-bible-in-detail-/206912162674361/

When one studies the Hebrew and Greek scriptures, it becomes clear that omnipotent and omniscient God did make mistakes and repented. This means that the God did not know his own actions and the outcomes of the actions. According to Bible…  Now for some fine examples.

Let us first start with Old Testament. In the story of Noah(P), it is mention that:

And the LORD smelled a sweet savour; and the LORD said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground anymore for man’s sake; for the imagination of man’s heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more everything living, as I have done [Genesis 8:21]

And in the story of Moses(P), we read

    And the LORD repented of the evil which he

thought to do unto his people [Exodus 32:14]

Oh no! that is Old Testament, cries the Christian. The New Testament has replaced all that. Yes, in the New Testament, the monotheistic and henotheistic God of Israel, Yahweh, suddenly starts to be interpreted as Trinity. So, the concept of monotheistic and henotheistic God itself got abrogated in the New Testament as the Christians allege! So we have to assume that the monotheistic and henotheistic God of Israel did not know that he was Trinity and made a serious mistake or he simply changed his mind or in the worst case scenario, he cheated the People of Israel. Read more of this post

Proof of Abrogation From the Bible Part 1

Source: https://www.letmeturnthetables.com/2010/04/quran-abrogation-lie-of-lost-verses.html

There are many commandments in the Bible that changed. Instead of discussing them, I give concrete references for abrogation declared in the Bible.

‘For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.’ (Hebrews 7:12)

Well known Christian commentator Adam Clarke writes under this verse:

‘The priesthood, therefore, being changed, Jesus coming in the place of Aaron, the law of ordinances and ceremonies, which served only to point out the Messiah, must of necessity be changed also.’

Lost books of the Bible

In fact, there were many books to which even the authors of the Canonical books also referred but they are lost or at least not in the Bible.

Some of them are:

1- The Book of the Wars of the Lord mentioned in Numbers 21:14
2- Book of Jasher mentioned in Joshua 10: 13 etc
3- Book of Nathan the Prophet mentioned in2-Chronicles 9: 29
4- Acts of Rehoboam & Book of Shemaiah the prophet mentioned in 2-Chronicles 12:15
5- Book of the acts of Solomon mentioned in 1-Kings 11:41
6- Acts of Uzziah mentioned in 2-Chronicles 26:22

This proves that the teachings of the prophets have been lost. Do Christians have any scriptural proof or historical evidence that nothing of value has been lost in these books and their teachings and records have been preserved in their so-called canon now?

All this exposes the liars who try to put the authenticity Book of Islam to doubt while their own book of authority is in the worst condition on the very accounts they try to challenge the Quran.


…by Waqar Akbar Cheema


No. of Surahs in the Mushaf of Ibn Masud

Source: http://icraa.org/surahs-mushaf-ibn-masud/#_ftn14

Waqar Akbar Cheema


One of the arguments used by Orientalist and Missionary critics of Islam to cast aspersions on Qur’anic preservation is related to the fact that the beloved companion of the Prophet Ibn Mas‘ood chose not to write three of the 114 surahs in his copy of the Qur’an. In order to understand why he made such a choice and if he considered these surahs part of the Qur’an, the evidence that discusses these issues must be examined. Throughout this presentation, it will be proved that Ibn Mas‘ood did in fact consider these surahs part of the Qur’an by the testimony of the same people who noted that he did not include them in his mushaf. After reading the explanations provided herein, there should be no doubt that Ibn Mas‘ood’s mushaf is in no way contradictory to the claimed impeccable preservation of the Noble Qur’an

1. Introduction

Some of those who tend to question the legitimacy of the claim of absolute preservation of Noble Qur’an often bring up the issue of surahs missing from Ibn Mas‘ood’s (d. 33 AH) mushaf.

2. Surahs missing in Ibn Mas‘ood’s mushaf

It is said that Ibn Mas‘ood’s mushaf (codex) did not have three surahs: al-Fatihah and al-mu’awwizatayn (al-Falaq and al-Nas), i.e. nos. 1, 113 and 114.[1]

We shall deal the issue of al-Fatihah and al-mu’awwizatayn separately. For each case we shall first see the reports forming the basis for the confusion and then probe further to discover the truth. Read more of this post


I got this from: https://abeau11.wordpress.com/2015/04/03/49-satanic-lies-contradictions-in-the-gospels-of-john/

 Now, let’s play a quick memory game shall we? Three weeks ago from you reading this,tell me what you had exactly for breakfast and tell me word for word, what any of your conversations were doing the 12:00p.m. the 3:00 p.m. and the 6:30 p.m.were? Can’t remember that far back? Then let’s say, one week ago? Still can’t remember? Okay then what about 2 days ago or even yesterday?

Well,for some of us, we can’t even remember things from this morning right? So with that being said, if Christians theologians are correct that the Gospel of John was written 60-200 years after Jesus’ death. How on earth could anyone remember WORD FOR WORD anything Jesus could have said? It’s virtually impossible. Even worse there are three MAJOR logic problems with this gospels:

  1. John’s gospel has NO NAME attributed to it to make us believe this is or was JESUS’ Disciple!
  2. John’s gospel was written 60 to 200 years after Jesus’ death
  3. John’s gospel is written in GREEK a language that is not of the Hebrew people with no Hebrew version ever found or in existence!

Face it folks, there is no proof anywhere that any of Jesus’ true Disciples ever wrote any of the Gospels period! Yet, still, I believe there are still some truth (based off the Old Testament) in the gospels. Research those along with the Old Testament word of God. If they do not CONTRADICT God’s word, then they are safe to listen too. However below, we will now see why MOST of these Gospels are purposely ADDED lies of Greece and Rome to turn us away from the GOD OF Jesus to force us into sin and to force us into serving a blasphemous lie! Read more of this post